CPS data summary Quarter 3 2020-2021
- Overall pre-charge and prosecutions
- Hate crime
- Domestic Abuse
- Impact of COVID-19
- About CPS data
- Understanding CPS data definitions and caveats
- Data spreadsheets
This Q3 data release covers the 3-month period 1 October to 31 December 2020, with the previous three quarters provided to illustrate trends. The impact of the first national lockdown on the Criminal Justice System in 2020 continues to be reflected in the Q3 20/21 data. Nationally there are significantly more cases in the court system then in February 2020.
The magistrates’ court and Crown Court continued to increase the number of hearings and the range of types of cases heard. The number of half day sessions covered by the CPS increased from 68,632 in 20/21-Q2 to 79,395 in 20/21-Q3 - this is 2% higher than 77,855 in 19/20-Q4 so more cases are being finalised, but there remains a significant backlog of cases waiting to be heard.
The focus of this summary continues to be the impact of COVID-19 in Q3 20/21. Key points to note:
- Though social distancing continues to impact the courts it is not to the same extent as the first lockdown. While the Crown Court finalised prosecutions are 2% below pre-COVD levels the magistrates’ court is working through the backlog and finalised 12% more than pre-COVID. Both these figures need to be seen in the context of the 61% fall in completed prosecutions in Q1 20/21 compared to pre-COVID levels.
- The disparity between receipts and finalisations has stabilised. Following a peak of 184,565 in August 2020, the live caseload was just over 173,498 at the end of Q3 20/21. Though it has started to gradually reduce, the live caseload is still 64,029 or 58.5% higher than it was in Q4 19/20.
- The fall in caseload is only in the magistrates’ court where the live caseload dropped from 124,824 in Q2 20/21 to 108,960 in Q3 20/21. The caseload remains 44,759, or 70%, higher than February 2020.
- The live caseload continues to increase in the Crown Court with 64,538 cases at the end of Q3 20/21. This is an increase of 19,270 cases or 43% since Q4 19/20. The mix of cases in the Crown Court backlog would be, on average, more complex than pre-COVID. This includes difficulties encountered in hearing multi-handed cases and large jury trials when Crown Courts began to reopen.
- A comparison of the rolling 12-month totals as of Q3 19/20 and Q3 20/21 shows that the number of rape suspects submitted by the police to the CPS for a charging decision has increased by 20%, resulting in more suspects entering the Criminal Justice System. In the future this, in conjunction with the increase in the proportion of suspects charged to 62.8%, will lead to more defendants appearing in court and facing prosecution but there will be a delay before the volumes and outcomes will be realised in the data.
- Rape prosecutions require more consultations and longer investigations. The rolling 12-month total at Q3 20/21 shows that there were an average of 2.73 consultations per rape defendant compared to 1.62 overall.
|Receipts from the police||The volume of pre-charge receipts has continued to fall, from 61,122 in Q2 20/21 to 58,002 in Q3 20/21.|
|Timeliness||The average time for the police and CPS to charge is rising, from 30.2 days in Q2 20/21 to 34.7 days in Q3 20/21.|
The proportion of suspects charged (out of all legal decisions) has marginally decreased from 75.2% in Q2 20/21 to 74.7% in Q3 20/21. The Q3 20/21 rate is at a similar level to pre-COVID.
The volume of defendants charged has fallen slightly compared to the last four quarters.
|Completed prosecutions||After the significant decrease in Q1 20/21 due to lockdown, the volumes have exceeded pre-COVID levels in Q3 20/21. There were 118,460 completed prosecutions in Q3 20/21 as the justice system started to recover from the impact of the first lockdown. For comparison in the quarter before lockdown, Q4 19/20, 107,497 prosecutions were completed.|
The conviction rate has decreased from 87.4% in Q2 20/21 to 83.4% in Q3 20/21, though this has been affected by the reduction of trials during the first national lockdown causing a different mix of finalised cases than would be normal pre-COVID. Caution should be taken when comparing.
|Receipts from the police||The volume of police receipts increased from 9,432 in Q2 RYTD 2019/20 to 10,408 in Q2 RYTD 2020/21 - a 10.4% increase.|
Owing to the impact of the pandemic, total completed prosecutions fell from 11,504 in Q3 19/20 RYTD to 9,834 in Q3 20/21 RYTD - a 14.5% decrease.
As the justice system started to recover from the impact of the first lockdown, there has been an increase in completed prosecutions over the past quarter, from 2,755 in Q2 to 3,361 in Q3 20/21 - a 22.0% increase.
|Uplifts||The proportion of convictions with an announced and recorded sentence uplift increased over the period from 76.4% in Q3 19/20 RYTD to 79.2% in Q3 20/21 RYTD.|
The conviction rate increased from 84.8% in Q3 19/20 RYTD to 87.1% in Q3 20/21 RYTD.
|Receipts from the police|
The volume of pre-charge receipts from the police rose from Q2 RYTD to reach 81,943 in Q3 2020/21 RYTD, similar to 82,010 in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
However, there was a fall in actual numbers over the last two quarters to 19,113 in Q3 2020/21 from 21,789 in Q1 2020/21.
The average time to charge for the police and CPS rose to 16.6 days in Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 14.3 days in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
Of all legal pre-charge decisions, the total volume charged fell to 52,817 in Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 57,408 in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
Over the past three quarters the actual volume charged fell to 12,631 in Q3 2020/21 compared with 13,211 in Q2 2020/21 and 13,287 in Q1 2020/21.
The proportion charged (out of all legal decisions) fell to 70.8% in Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 73.4% in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
The charge rate fell slightly to 70.5% in Q3 2020/21 from 71.2% in Q2 2020/21.
The total volume of completed prosecutions fell to 54,047 in Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 65,285 in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
However, the actual volume prosecuted rose to 15,745 in Q3 2020/21 compared with 15,331 in Q2 2020/21; 8,744 in Q1 2020/21.
The total volume of convictions fell to 42,513 in Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 50,506 in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
The actual volume convicted fell slightly to 12,044 in Q3 2020/21 from 12,363 in Q2 2020/21 which had risen from 6,920 in Q1 2020/21.
The conviction rate rose to 78.7% in Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 77.4% in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
The conviction rate fell to 76.5% in Q3 2020/21 following a rise by quarter throughout the year reaching 80.6% in Q2 2020/21.
The proportion of prosecutions dropped fell to 16.5% Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 17.0% in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
|Receipts from the police|
The total volume of pre-charge receipts from the police rose to 3,378 in Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 2,788 in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
The actual volume of pre-charge receipts from the police fell slightly over the last quarter to 858 in Q3 compared with 920 In Q2 2020/21, similar to 856 in Q1 2020/21.
The average time for the police and CPS to charge rose to 143.7 days in Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 139.6 days in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
The total proportion of suspects charged (out of all legal decisions RYTD) has increased to 62.8% Q3 2020/21 RYTD compared with 54.7% in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
Over the past quarter the actual proportion charged stayed steady at 65.4% in Q3 compared with 65.3% in Q2 and 58.3% in Q1 2020/21.
There is an increase in the total volume of suspects charged from 1,929 in Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 1,819 in Q3 2019/20 RYTD - a rise of 6.0%.
Over the past quarter there was a rise in the actual volume to 491 in Q3 2020/21 compared with 448 in Q2 2020/21 and 487 in Q1 2020/21.
The volume and proportion of suspects charged rose RYTD and by quarter
‘Admin finalised’ out of all pre-charge decisions rose to 26.5% in Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 25.2% in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
Owing to the impact of COVID-19 on the CJS, the total volume of completed prosecutions fell to 1,490 in Q3 2020/21 RYTD from 2,183 in Q3 2019/20 RYTD.
The actual volume prosecuted rose over the last two quarters to 486 in Q3 2020/21 from 306 in Q2 and 218 in Q1. This is the highest quarter since COVID began, with a previous high of 480 in Q4 2019/20.
Despite gradual reductions, caseload remains far above normal levels
HMCPSI acknowledges the significant challenges the CPS has faced, and continues to face, in managing court backlogs and increasing caseloads.
The magistrates’ court live caseload continued to fall in December while the Crown Court continues to increase.
The number of cases finalised and leaving the Criminal Justice System continues to be higher than the number received.
Magistrates’ Court Caseload remains above normal levels
The magistrates’ court live caseload reached a peak of 130,551 cases in August before reducing to 108,960 in December.
This is still significantly higher than February. The caseload at the end of December is 70% (44,759 cases) higher than pre-COVID.
In December the number of cases finalised is still just exceeding the number of cases received allowing the number of live cases to fall.
Part of the magistrates’ court fall in the live caseload is due to cases being sent to the Crown Court. These have not left the Criminal Justice System but have moved to the Crown Court live caseload.
Crown Court Caseload is Increasing
The Crown Court live caseload continues to increase. As the magistrates’ court finalised more cases this allowed the cases to flow in to the Crown Court.
The mix of cases in the Crown Court backlog would be, on average, more complex than the pre-COVID mix.
The Crown Court live caseload was increasing before COVID-19 but since May there has been a significant increase.
At the end of December there were 64,538 cases in the Crown Court. This is an increase of 43% (19,270 cases) since pre-COVID.
The number of cases received has been higher than finalisations since June which has caused the number of live cases to increase.
The CPS uses management information to understand and address performance issues. This data is regularly shared with partners in the Criminal Justice System to improve understanding of efficiency and effectiveness, and where necessary, support the development of system-wide reforms.
Previously, the CPS has published annual data on Violence against Women and Girls (VAWG) offences and hate crime. In order to enhance accountability and transparency in regards to CPS performance, the CPS will now publish quarterly data on a wider range of offence types.
The CPS does not publish official statistics. The official statistics relating to crime and policing are maintained by the Home Office and Office for National Statistics. Official statistics relating to sentencing, criminal court proceedings, offenders brought to justice, the courts and the judiciary are maintained by the Ministry of Justice. CPS management information is derived from the CPS case management system, and as with any large scale recording system, data is subject to possible errors in entry and processing. The figures are provisional and subject to change as more information is recorded by the CPS.
Note in particular that the CPS maintains a central record of prosecution outcomes with reference to a number of case monitoring flags, including modern slavery and human trafficking, hate crime, domestic abuse, and rape. CPS statistics are dependent upon lawyers and administrative staff identifying and correctly flagging cases on the case management system. CPS data is accurate only to the extent that flags have been correctly applied. Note also that:
- A flag is applied at the onset of any case referred by the police to the CPS, and remains in place even if the charge is not proceeded with, is amended, or dropped.
- A flag may be applied at a later point which differs from that originally identified by the police.
- Although charges specifically related to a flag may be considered at the time of the pre-charge decision, the defendant may in fact be charged with another offence. Similarly, there may be cases where a person is convicted of a lesser offence than that with which they were proceeded against.
In these statistics, a defendant represents one person in a single set of proceedings, which may involve one or more charges. A set of proceedings usually relates to an incident or series of related incidents that are the subject of a police file. If a set of proceedings relates to more than one person then each is counted as a defendant. Sometimes one person is involved in several sets of proceedings during the same year: if so, he or she is counted as a defendant on each occasion.
The quarterly casework statistics in these reports, comprise defendants dealt with by the 14 CPS Areas, the specialised casework handled by the Central Casework Divisions which include, those proceedings previously conducted by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), the Department of Health (DoH) and the former Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office.
The data that forms the basis of this data release is derived from the CPS Case Management System (CMS) and its associated Management Information System (MIS). The data is held within a database within the MIS, based on defendants. The tables include total data on all defendants irrespective of sex or gender. Data has been broken down by overall volumes and proportions.
Pre-charge decision data
The total number of suspects referred by the police to the CPS for a charging decision.
The number of pre-charge receipts, for different crime types, referred by the police relies on (a) the police identifying and flagging the cases, by suspect, prior to being referred to CPS and (b) CPS administrators identifying and flagging those cases on the CPS Casework Management System, when they are first registered.
Of all the suspects referred by the police, pre-charge decisions are those where CPS has completed making a decision on whether to charge, take no further action, recommend an out of court decision, administratively finalise or ‘other’. The volume of pre-charge decisions, for each different crime type, completed by the CPS will be a total of those referred by the police (flagged by the police and CPS at registration) together with any flagged by CPS prosecutors and administrators at a later date, but before the final pre-charge decision is completed. The total pre-charge decision data is based on the date the charging advice was completed and provided to the police. Therefore, data in this data release may include pre-charge decisions on cases referred by the police to the CPS in previous quarters or years.
Pre-charge legal decisions include: charge, take no further action or recommend an out of court decision.
Charging decisions are where CPS is satisfied that the legal test for prosecution, set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors is met: there is enough evidence to provide a ‘realistic prospect of conviction’ against each defendant and the prosecution is in the public interest.
No Further Action:
NFA decisions are where CPS has decided that no further action should be taken; the case cannot proceed to charge as it does not meet the Code for Crown Prosecutor test, for either evidential or public interest reasons.
Out of court disposals:
A simple caution, conditional caution, reprimand, final warning or TIC (taken into consideration) issued by the CPS at pre-charge stage.
Pre-charge non-legal decisions include: administratively finalised and ‘other’.
Administratively finalised decisions are not legal decisions and may not be the end of the case.
The reasons for recording an administrative finalisation include:
- The CPS may ask the police to provide further information where there is insufficient evidence to make a charging decision, or the police are requesting early investigative advice. If the police do not respond within three months, following reminders, the case is closed on CMS. If the police provide additional evidence, the case is reopened in CMS and, if possible, a charging decision is made.
- Cases where the CPS have advised the police to charge but the suspect has not been charged, due to the suspect not answering police bail or being located, will also be administratively finalised. If the suspect is subsequently located and charged the case is reopened in CMS.
- Cases where a file submission has been rejected at triage because items are missing, and the police have been asked to supply the additional material and have not responded to reminders.
- Where the case has been returned to the police, with or without a lawyer’s advice and/or actions, and the police decide to take no further action on the allegation.
- The suspect has died.
The result of the charging decision is not known or has not been given for that suspect.
Prosecution Outcomes Data
CPS outcomes are recorded on a defendant basis. In some cases, a number of defendants may be prosecuted together. All defendants may be convicted; all may be acquitted; or some may be convicted and others acquitted.
The defendant pleads guilty. The data includes defendants who pleaded guilty to some charges, and were either convicted or dismissed after trial of other charges.
Convictions after trial:
The defendant pleads not guilty but is convicted by the magistrates or by a jury after evidence is heard.
Proofs in absence:
These are mostly minor motoring matters which are heard by the court in the absence of the defendant.
Acquittals/Dismissals after trial:
The defendant pleads not guilty and, following a trial, is acquitted by the jury or proceedings are dismissed by the magistrates.
Consideration of the evidence and of the public interest may lead the CPS to discontinue or drop proceedings at any time before the start of the trial. The figures include both cases discontinued in advance of the hearing, where the CPS offered no evidence and those withdrawn at court. Also included are cases in which the defendant was bound over to keep the peace.
Administratively Finalised (post charge):
When the prosecution cannot proceed because the defendant has failed to appear at court and a Bench Warrant has been issued for his or her arrest; or the defendant has died; been found unfit to plead; or where proceedings are adjourned indefinitely. If the police trace a missing defendant, then proceedings can continue.
Committal proceedings in which the defendant is discharged.
Principal Offence Category Data
The Principal Offence Category indicates the most serious offence with which the defendant is charged at the time of finalisation. Where the nature of the charges alters during the life of a case, the Principal Offence at the time of finalisation may be different than would have seemed appropriate at an earlier stage of proceedings. In all such cases the Principal Offence category to be recorded is that which applies at finalisation, regardless of whether this is more serious, or less serious, than would have applied earlier in the life of the case.
Offences are divided into: homicide, offences against the person, sexual offences, burglary, robbery, theft & handling, fraud & forgery, criminal damage, drugs offences, public order, motoring, and all other offences excluding motoring.
CPS records do not identify the principal offence for cases resulting in an administrative finalisation or where the defendant has been committed for sentence. These are excluded from Table 3.1, Prosecution Data Tables.
The CPS monitoring of cases involving offences of child abuse, crimes against older people, domestic abuse, hate crime, modern slavery and rape involve the application of monitoring ‘flags’ or case-markers to applicable cases that are recorded on the CPS’ electronic Case Management System (CMS). The data that is produced through the application of the flag is primarily used for monitoring performance on all cases that involve allegations or charges where these categories of criminal offending apply. The data is accurate only to the extent that the flags have been correctly applied.
The flag is applied from the onset of the case and will remain in place even if the charges are later amended or dropped. If a case commences under a different offence but during the prosecution an applicable charge is preferred, the case is flagged at that stage.
Any criminal offence which falls within the criteria set out in Appendix A of the Working Together to Safeguard Children document and/or as defined in the CPS legal guidance on Child Abuse and involves a victim under the age of 18.
Child abuse includes physical, emotional and sexual criminal offences, as well as neglect, of a child. Such cases would normally include, for example:
- parental assault where reasonable chastisement is not a defence;
- sexual offences;
- child homicides;
- child cruelty, including neglect;
- child prostitution;
- abandonment of a child;
- forced marriage involving an under 18 year-old;
- child pornography;
- trafficked children;
- familial abduction; and
- non-recent child abuse where victim is now an adult.
Cases that would not normally be expected to be flagged include:
- motoring offences where the child has been injured or killed;
- medical negligence; and
- property offences.
Crime against an Older Person:
Where the victim is 65 or over, any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be committed by reason of the victim’s vulnerability through age or presumed vulnerability through age.
Disability Hate Crime:
Any incident which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice towards a person because of their disability or perceived disability.
Any incident or pattern of incidents of controlling, coercive or threatening behaviour, violence or abuse (psychological, physical, sexual, financial or emotional) between those who are or have been intimate partners or family members, regardless of gender or sexuality. Family members include mother, father, son, daughter, sister, and grandparents, whether directly related, in laws or step family. This is not an exhaustive list and may also be extended to uncles, aunts, cousins etc.
Any incident which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a person’s sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation.
Human Trafficking/Modern Slavery
The following offences are flagged as human trafficking/modern slavery.
- Offences committed prior to 31st July 2015, are:
- Sexual Offences Act 2003 (Section 57)
- Sexual Offences Act 2003 (Section 58)
- Sexual Offences Act 2003 (Section 59)
- Sexual Offences Act 2003 (Section 59A)
- Asylum and Immigration [Treatment of Claimants] Act 2004 Section 4(1)
- Asylum and Immigration [Treatment of Claimants] Act 2004 Section 4(2)
- Asylum and Immigration [Treatment of Claimants] Act 2004 Section 4(3)
- Asylum and Immigration [Treatment of Claimants] Act 2004 Section 4(1A)
- Asylum and Immigration [Treatment of Claimants] Act 2004 Section 4(1B)
- Asylum and Immigration [Treatment of Claimants] Act 2004 Section 4(1C)
- Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (Section 71)
The Modern Slavery Act 2015 came into force on 31st July 2015. The offences to be flagged after this date are:
- Modern Slavery Act 2015 (Section 1(a))
- Modern Slavery Act 2015 (Section 1(b))
- Modern Slavery Act 2015 (Section 2)
- Modern Slavery Act 2015 (Section 4(2))
- Modern Slavery Act 2015 (Section 4(3))
Any incident which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice based on a person’s ethnicity or perceived ethnicity.
Any incident which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice based on a person’s religion or perceived religion.
The following offences are defined and flagged as rape by the CPS.
- S1 Sexual Offences Act 1956
- S5 Sexual Offences Act 1956
- S1 Sexual Offences Act 2003
- S5 Sexual Offences Act 2003
- S30(3) Sexual Offences act 2003, also
- An attempt to commit any of the above offences under the Criminal Attempts Act 1981
- Incitement or conspiracy to commit any of the above offences
Any incident which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a person’s transgender identity or perceived transgender identity.
CPS Annual Data Tables
The data that forms the basis of the annual tables is derived from the CPS Case Management System (CMS), CPS Witness Management System (WMS) and its associated Management Information System (MIS). Defendant and complainant/witness data is held within separate databases within the MIS. Data cannot be correlated between the separate databases. The data tables include total data on all perpetrators and complainants, irrespective of sex or gender.
The Annual Data Tables for Violence against Women and Girls, Rape and Hate Crime provide breakdowns of pre-charge decisions and prosecution outcomes by CPS Area and by the originating Police Force Area.
Included are tables showing national breakdowns of the equality profiles of defendants and complainants for the most recent complete financial year.
In relation to complainant data, the WMS is a bespoke case management system designed by and for specialist Witness Care Unit (WCU) staff to effectively manage their cases. The WMS records complainant and witness data and, where recorded, the system includes data reporting equality profiles of complainants (and witnesses). The WMS can only provide data on the volumes of complainants associated with prosecution proceedings, by sex and age (where available), rather than the outcome of those prosecutions. It does not include any data which reports the volumes of alleged complainants associated with pre-charge proceedings and therefore cannot include data on police referrals and CPS charging.
Reasons for non-convictions
All cases resulting in an outcome other than a conviction are allocated a reason explaining why the case failed. If more than one reason applies, the principal reason is selected. Cases resulting in a post charge administrative finalisation are allocated the reason 'Admin Finalised'; no other reason need be recorded. If the defendant pleads not guilty, evidence is heard and the defence is required to present its case; and the case then results in acquittal or dismissal, then the reason 'Acquittal after trial' is allocated; no other reason applies. A reason must be allocated for all other non-conviction outcomes i.e. discontinued; withdrawn; no evidence offered; no case to answer; prosecution stayed; indictment stayed; left on file; judge directed acquittal; discharged committal.
Acquittals after trial: The defendant is found not guilty by the magistrates or jury after a contested hearing in which the defence is called on to present its case (Cases dismissed no case to answer or judge directed acquittals are not included).
Post-charge Administrative Finalisation: When a prosecution cannot proceed because a defendant: has failed to appear at court and a Bench Warrant has been issued for his or her arrest; or the defendant has died, or is found unfit to plead: or where proceedings are adjourned indefinitely. If a Bench Warrant is executed the case may be reopened.
Complainant Issues: During 2018-19, the CPS revised the list of reasons which apply to non-conviction outcomes. As a result it is no longer possible to separately report complainant retraction or withdrawal and non-attendance. It is however, still possible to report the total number of non-conviction outcomes due to complainant specific issues.
The reason should be used when the evidence of the complainant supports the prosecution case, but one or all of the following apply:
- the complainant fails to attend, or
- refuses to be called, or
- to give evidence as a witness, or
- withdraws a complaint, and
- includes complainants who have been intimidated but it is inappropriate to compel them to attend court.
If the evidence of the complainant fails to support the prosecution of the defendant including issues of credibility leading to a non-conviction outcome, but the complainant has not retracted.
All Other Reasons: These include all other evidential reasons or where it was not in the public interest to continue the prosecution.
The equality profiles of defendants and complainants, by sex and age are reported on in these data tables. Also included is a breakdown by ethnicity for defendants flagged as domestic abuse.
Data on the gender of defendants and complainants are held in the CPS Management Information System, however the records are not complete. The gender of the defendant is unknown in some cases and may not be recorded in others.
Data on the age of defendants and complainants are collated by the CPS with reference to a series of age bands calculated from the date of birth recorded by the police. This means that the age band defendants are allocated to represents their current age rather than their age at the time the offence was committed. Individual ages cannot be disaggregated from these bands. The age band information should not be viewed as a comprehensive record of defendants' ages. Defendants with no date of birth recorded are allocated to a 'not provided' category.
Data on the ethnicity of defendants and complainants are collected by the CPS in accordance with the agreed Criminal Justice System definitions for the 16+1 self-defined ethnicity (SDE) categories. Police forces are required to use the SDE 16+1 codes when spoken contact has taken place and an individual has been given an opportunity to state their self-perceived ethnicity. Defendants may not state their ethnicity or it may not be recorded. Ethnicity data are provided by the police and are subject to varying levels of error and omission at local levels. We do not consider therefore that full reliance can be placed on this information.
Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) caseload data are available through its Case Management System (CMS) and associated Management Information System (MIS). The CPS collects data to assist in the effective management of its prosecution functions. The CPS does not collect data which constitutes official statistics as defined in the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007.
These data have been drawn from the CPS's administrative IT system, which, as with any large scale recording system, is subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. The figures are provisional and subject to change as more information is recorded by the CPS. We are committed to improving the quality of our data and from mid-June 2015 introduced a new data assurance regime which may explain some unexpected variance in some future data sets.
The official statistics relating to crime and policing are maintained by the Home Office and the official statistics relating to sentencing, criminal court proceedings, offenders brought to justice, the courts and the judiciary are maintained by the Ministry of Justice.