Two men charged in connection with filming antisemitic TikTok videos
Two men have been charged with religiously aggravated harassment offences after allegations that they travelled to a predominately Jewish area to film antisemitic social media videos.
Adam Bedoui, 20, and Abdelkader Amir Bousloub, 21, are due to appear at Thames Magistrates’ Court on Saturday, 9 May 2026.
The charges relate to allegations that Jewish people in Stamford Hill, north London, were being approached, harassed, and filmed.
Huw Rogers, Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS Direct, said: “The Crown Prosecution Service has decided to charge Adam Bedoui, 20, and Abdelkader Amir Bousloub, 21, with religiously aggravated intentional harassment and intentional harassment following an incident where Jewish people in Stamford Hill were being approached, harassed and filmed.
“Our team of out-of-hours prosecutors from CPS Direct worked to establish that there is sufficient evidence to bring charges and it is in the public interest to pursue criminal proceedings.
“We have worked closely with the Metropolitan Police as it has carried out its investigation.
“Both defendants are due to appear at Thames Magistrates’ Court on Saturday, 9 May 2026.
“We remind all concerned that proceedings against both defendants are active and that they have the right to a fair trial.
“It is vital that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in anyway prejudice these proceedings.”
Notes to editors
- Adam Bedoui, [DOB: 24/05/2005], of West Drayton, Hillingdon, west London, is charged with religiously aggravated intentional harassment, contrary to section 31 (b) and (4) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, and intentional harassment, contrary to Section 4A (1) and (5) of the Public Order Act 1986.
- Abdelkader Amir Bousloub, [DOB: 26/02/2005], of West Drayton, Hillingdon, west London, is charged with religiously aggravated intentional harassment, contrary to section 31 (b) and (4) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, and intentional harassment, contrary to Section 4A (1) and (5) of the Public Order Act 1986.
- The function of the CPS is not to decide whether a person is guilty of a criminal offence, but to make fair, independent and objective assessments about whether it is appropriate to present charges for a criminal court to consider.
- The CPS assessment of any case is not in any sense a finding of, or implication of, any guilt or criminal conduct. It is not a finding of fact, which can only be made by a court, but rather an assessment of what it might be possible to prove to a court, in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors.