Honour-Based Violence and Forced Marriage
- Restraining and Ancillary Orders
- Investigation, Risk Assessment and Case Building
- Victims and Witnesses
This guidance provides:
- A general overview on so called ‘honour-based” violence (HBV) and other harmful practices
- Specific direction on the offence of forced marriage (FM); and
- Direction on the evidential considerations to be taken account when reviewing and charging cases of HBV including FM.
These crimes are a violation of human rights and may be a form of domestic and/or sexual violence. There is no, and cannot be, honour or justification for abusing the human rights of others.
Experience tells us that HBV and FM is usually perpetrated by the victims’ families, extended families and members of their community in order to protect or defend the ‘honour’ of the family or community. Instances of HBV can also lead to conspiracy between the families, extended families and communities of the perpetrator in order to protect them as opposed to the victim.
The government’s commitment to end HBV and FM is embedded in the cross-government Ending Violence against Women and Girls (VAWG) Strategy: 2016 to 2020. The strategy is underpinned by effective partnership working at both a local and national level.
The VAWG approach recognises that victims of HBV and FM crimes are disproportionally female. The approach acknowledges VAWG as a fundamental abuse of human rights and women’s rights. The UK government has signed and ratified the United Nations call to all states to prevent and respond to violence against women: The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).
However the CPS is committed to all victims of crimes grouped together as ‘VAWG’ and to that end, are inclusive in their approach. All VAWG policies are applied fairly and equitably to all perpetrators and victims of crime – irrespective of their gender.
The CPS and Home Office adopt the following definition of HBV:
""Honour-based" violence is a crime or incident which has or may have been committed to protect or defend the honour of the family and/or community."
There is no statutory definition of HBV.
There is no specific offence of "honour-based” crime". It is an umbrella term to encompass various offences covered by existing legislation. HBV can be described as a collection of practices, which are used to control behaviour within families or other social groups to protect perceived cultural and religious beliefs and/or honour. Such violence can occur when perpetrators perceive that a relative has shamed the family and/or community by breaking their honour code.
A FM is a marriage conducted without the valid consent of one or both parties and where duress is a factor. FM is a specific offence under s121 of the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014. Prior to the introduction of the offence, prosecutors dealt with FM cases using existing legislation such as false imprisonment, kidnapping and offences of violence where this is a feature of the offending.
Other forms of HBV include practices performed by perpetrators on victims for cultural or socio-conventional motives which have harmful consequences. Some of these practices include (this list should not, however, be considered as complete: FGM; Breast Ironing; and dowry abuse.
Further information for CPS prosecutors can be found on the Knowledge Hub.
Breast ironing is a form of child abuse and whilst there is no specific offence it can still be prosecuted under UK law. Please refer to the CPS legal guidance on Child Abuse.
Since 2010, the CPS identifies and flags all cases of HBV and FM. It is important that these cases are identified and flagged at the beginning so that issues are identified and the case is managed properly. Therefore this guidance must also be read in conjunction with the Guidance on Identifying and Flagging HBV and FM.
HBV cases will be prosecuted under the specific offence committed e.g. common assault, inflicting Grievous Bodily Harm, stalking and harassment, kidnap, rape, threats to kill and murder. These crimes should be identified as "honour crimes" on CMS as well as by their named offence(s). It is especially important to note the links between HBV and Controlling or Coercive Behaviour.
Other relevant CPS legal guidance might also need to be considered such as:
- CPS Domestic Abuse Guidelines for Prosecutors
- CPS Rape and Sexual Offences legal guidance
- CPS Female Genital Mutilation legal guidance
- CPS Stalking and Harassment legal guidance
- CPS Acid and other corrosive substance attacks: interim guidance
It may also be useful to refer to the College of Policing’s FM and HBV Authorised Professional Practice.
FM is a criminal offence under the Anti-Social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014 (the 2014 Act). Section 121 of the 2014 Act states:
S121(1) - A person commits an offence in England and Wales if he or she -
- uses violence, threats or any other form of coercion for the purpose of causing another person to enter into a marriage, and
- believes, or ought to reasonably to believe, that the conduct may cause the other person to enter into the marriage without free and full consent.
Coercion means an external force which cannot be resisted and which pushes its victim into acting in a way other than that wished for. Coercion includes emotional force, physical force or the threat of physical force and financial pressure.
S121(2) – In relation to a victim who lacks capacity to consent to marriage, the offence under subsection (1) is capable of being committed by any conduct carried out for the purpose of causing the victim to enter into a marriage (whether or not the conduct amounts to violence, threats or any other form of coercion).
S121(3) -A person commits an offence under the law of England and Wales if her or she -
- practices any form of deception with the intention of causing another person to leave the United Kingdom, and
- intends the other person to be subjected to conduct outside the United Kingdom that is an offence under subsection (1) or would be an offence under that subsection if the victim were in England or Wales.
S121(4) “Marriage” means any religious or civil ceremony of marriage (whether or not legally binding).
S121(5) “Lacks capacity” means lacks capacity within the meaning of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
S121(6) – It is irrelevant whether the conduct mentioned in paragraph (a) of subsection (1) is directed at the victim of the offence under that subsection or another person.
The offence of FM will apply to a person who intentionally forces a person to enter into marriage, believing the person does not consent, or a person who deceives someone into going abroad for the specific purpose of forcing them to marry. An offence is committed whether or not the FM goes ahead.
Subsection 121(7) and 121(8) of the 2014 Act make provision for extra-territorial jurisdiction to be taken over both the coercion and deception elements of the FM offence. Any of the prohibited acts in Section 121(1) and 121(2) carried out outside the UK by a UK national or person habitually resident in England or Wales, or to a UK national or person habitually resident in England or Wales, will be an offence under domestic law and triable in the courts of England and Wales. It will also be an offence under domestic law if the prohibited acts are conducted by or against a person habitually resident in England and Wales, but take place in Scotland or Northern Ireland.
Section 121(9) and 121(10) of the 2014 Act sets out the maximum penalties for the specific offences in Section 121(1) and 121(2). On summary conviction the maximum penalty is a fine or six months' imprisonment (rising to 12 months once the increase in magistrates' courts sentencing powers in s154(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is commenced), or both, and on conviction on indictment the maximum penalty is seven years' imprisonment.
Victims of FM are entitled to lifelong anonymity under section 173 of the Policing and Crime Act 2017.
Breaching a victim’s anonymity is a criminal offence. A victim can, however, give their written consent to waive anonymity and the judge can vary and lift anonymity where it is considered to be in the interests of justice.
The Government Definition of Domestic Abuse incorporates HBV. The court should review the sentencing councils Overarching Principles: Domestic Abuse guidelines when considering what sentence to impose.
This section should be read in conjunction with the Sentencing Overview guidance which provides further detail on prosecutors' obligations regarding unduly lenient sentences and applications for ancillary orders.
Prosecutors' duty to actively assist the court should include reference to the abuse of trust in a domestic setting as an aggravating factor, as well as the vulnerability of complainants. Specific reference should be made to the nature of offending involved, and a particular emphasis on the nature of the relationship between the complainant and perpetrator to assist the court in reaching an informed decision about the most appropriate sentence.
A FMPO is a civil law remedy, the aim of which is to provide protection to someone who is at risk of or has already been, forced into a marriage without giving their full and free consent.
A FMPO can be sought under Section 63A of the Family Law Act 1996 ( Part 4A, Family Law Act 1996 was created by the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007) and will be unique to each case, contain legally binding conditions and directions aimed at changing the behaviour of a person or persons trying to force someone into marriage. An application for an FMPO can be made by a victim or the person at risk of FM, a relevant third party (a local authority) or any other person with the permission of the court.
A FMPO can be made to protect a victim from a spouse, family member or anyone involved. Involvement can include aiding, abetting, counselling, procuring, encouraging, or assisting another person to force or attempt to force a person to marry. FMPO’s can last for a specified period of time or if the court so desires for an indefinite period i.e. until varied or discharged. The order can relate to conduct either within or outside of England and Wales.
Breach of a FMPO is a criminal offence under Section 63CA, Family Law Act 1996. A person who, without reasonable excuse, does anything that they have been specifically prohibited from doing under the terms of a FMPO, is guilty of an offence. Breach of a FMPO carries a maximum penalty of five years’ imprisonment.
Prosecutors should note that a breach of a FMPO can be referred to the CPS by the police if a victim reports it in the first instance. A breach of a FMPO should be treated in the same way as a prosecution of any other breach of an order, for example, the breach of a non-molestation order. An individual would, however, only be guilty of a criminal offence, if he or she was aware of the existence of the order at the time of the breach (Section 63CA(2), Family Law Act 1996).
Victims who do not wish to pursue criminal proceedings for breach of a FMPO, have the option to progress the breach as a civil contempt of law court matter. However, where a complainant is reluctant to attend court and it is decided the case can only continue with the complainant's evidence to prove the case, the application of a witness summons may be considered, but as a last resort, please see the Retractions and Withdrawals by Complainant section of this guidance.
Prosecutors should work with the complainant, police and other relevant agencies to ensure that there is a comprehensive understanding of how a restraining order could be enforced practically, before making the application. All prosecutors should have in mind at the time of charge or review, whether a restraining order is appropriate in the event of a conviction or an acquittal.
It should be considered at the earliest stage if a victim would benefit from any other ancillary orders.
There are a number of civil legal remedies specifically aimed at protecting children. Although they are civil remedies, prosecutors may find it useful when building cases and should seek information from the police if appropriate. They include both civil and family orders that can be made to protect those threatened with, or already in, a FM. Some require the police or local authority to take action whilst others require the victim to seek an order on their own behalf. For further guidance see Annex A.
A Joint National Police Chief’s Council (NPCC) and CPS HBV and FM investigation and prosecution protocol was developed to enable police and prosecutors to quickly understand the action they must take when a crime is reported to the police and referred to the CPS for a charging decision, ensuring the safety of the victim is at the heart of the process. The protocol can be found here.
Prosecutors may also wish to refer to the NPCC Honour Based Abuse Strategy 2015 - 2018 and the detailed statutory multi-agency guidance to supplement statutory guidance. The multi-agency guidance provides advice and support to frontline practitioners, including police officers who deal with such cases.
Both the police and CPS have local specialist HBV and FM leads with whom they can consult with for advice and guidance on the handling of these cases. The list of CPS HBV and FM Leads can be found on the CPS internal Knowledge Hub.
Prosecutors should note that a number of challenges may arise with regard to victim confidence, witness corroboration and the familial setting of most such allegations, as well as jurisdiction as some cases may have an international dimension. A false crime may be alleged by members of the family for the police to expend resources locating the victim. This could result in the victim being delivered and returned to the environment from which they had escaped. The investigation will need to maintain a balance between seeking to secure the support of the wider communities whilst at the same time securing the safety of the victim. The victim's safety is however paramount and their views should be sought on this engagement.
Prosecutors should be aware that where there is a young victim of a HBV or FM, the local authority or social services are likely to have material or information which might be relevant to the prosecution case. In such cases, if the material or information might reasonably be considered capable of undermining the prosecution case or of assisting the defence, prosecutors are asked to take steps they regard as appropriate to obtain it. Good practice is to request the material and if that fails, apply to the Court. For further guidance see A Protocol between the CPS, Police and Local Authorities in the exchange of information in the investigation and prosecution of child abuse cases.
An effective strategy in the prosecution of these cases needs to involve scrutiny of the behaviour and actions of the suspect/defendant. This approach can:
- Help ensure the effective consideration of the overall allegation within the wider context of the relationship.
- Inform and support investigators to consider all available evidence.
- Lead to the swift and accurate assessment of risk which, in turn, can help to ensure a suitable multi-agency approach to increasing the safety of the victim.
The range of offending behaviour, with particular reference to other crimes, needs to be considered, such as enforced sexual activity including rape. Ultimately, prosecutors should be alert to the fact that an offender will follow a course of conduct which is used to control, coerce, dominate or exploit a complainant.
Identification of the triggers for abuse will assist in understanding the context of the offending. These issues should be considered as risk factors, rather than as causal links to the offending behaviour, and will assist prosecutors in their consideration of the public interest. This will also assist when considering factors to be taken into account for bail applications and/or terms for restraining orders at later stages of the prosecution process.
Please refer to the joint protocol for further information.
It is possible that a complainant may ask the police not to proceed any further with a prosecution case and say they no longer wish to give evidence.
The decision to compel a complainant must not be taken lightly and should be based on the specific facts of the case, and in particular, the needs and requirements of the complainant.
Where a complainant is reluctant to attend court and it is decided the case can only continue with the complainant's evidence, an application for a witness summons may be considered. This should not be done as a matter of course but should be considered when all other options have been explored and discounted. Please refer to the joint protocol and following section of the Domestic Abuse Guidelines for Prosecutors for further information.
Given the international nature of these crimes, early discussions with the extradition team at CPS Headquarters may assist.
Where an offence has been carried out overseas, prosecutors should request the police to investigate and obtain evidence from that country. Evidence may be obtained from travel or flight records, or the Home Office Border force.
Sometimes a person may be taken overseas on the pretext of a family holiday, the wedding of a relative or the illness of a grandparent. On arrival, their documents and passports may be taken away from them. Some even report their parents drugging them. In these cases, it may be a concerned friend, relative, partner or agency that reports them missing. These cases may initially be reported to the joint Home Office-Foreign and Commonwealth Office Forced Marriage Unit (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/forced-marriage#forced-marriage-unit), social care, police, education or a voluntary group. As with all cases of FM, confidentiality and discretion are vitally important. It is not advisable immediately to contact an overseas police service or organisation to make enquiries. Risks may arise if police or organisations overseas are contacted directly. If, through police actions, the family becomes aware that enquiries are being made, they may move the victim to another location or expedite the FM.
British Embassies and High Commissions can only help British nationals or, in certain circumstances EU or Commonwealth nationals. This means that if a non-British national leaves the UK to be forced into marriage overseas, the British Embassy or High Commission will not be able to assist them. If in doubt, ask the Forced Marriage Unit for advice.
A list of British Embassies and High Commissions can be found at Annex B.
A prosecution can be supported by the provision of expert evidence from those who have an understanding not only of HBV but specifically of the communities within which they commonly occur. Expert evidence can assist juries and magistrates' in areas with which they are not familiar. Prosecutors should familiarise themselves with the guidance on expert evidence.
Prosecutors may wish to make contact with the voluntary sector (particularly the specialist women's organisations) to identify experts. The need to access expertise when developing an investigation, prosecution, and to ensure jurors receive the information in reliable and admissible forms, cannot be over-emphasised. A list of specialist support agencies can be found at Annex C.
It is important for police and prosecutors to remember that these cases may involve some of our most vulnerable victims and witnesses who may have the least confidence in the criminal justice process. Victims often feel a loyalty to their family/community and this might make them particularly reluctant to support a prosecution. They may also need support mechanisms not just during the prosecution process, but also after the case is concluded. Victims of HBV and FM are entitled to an enhanced service under The Code of Practice for Victims of Crime: CPS Legal Guidance (Victim’s Code). The police and CPS will comply with their responsibilities as set out in the Victim’s Code.
HBV and FM also affect men as victims; this includes heterosexual men, as well as gay, bi and trans men. Boys and men may find it hard to ask for help.
Male victims are often targeted with HBV when they are in a relationship with a woman, or blamed for the behaviour of a woman, who is perceived as bringing shame to her family, culture or community. The woman involved may, herself, have suffered harm, within a situation of family control. If a man tries to defend a “dishonoured” woman he may be viewed as not complying with expected cultural expectations of approved ‘masculinity’ and therefore be targeted himself.
Men may be forced into marriage for reasons similar to woman and girls i.e. to fulfil family commitments and expectations, to secure visas or the desire of the family to control ‘unwanted’ behaviour and to protect a family’s reputation. FM may also be encouraged by the family/community linked to sexuality. Male victims may be forced to marry women because their families know or suspect they are gay or bisexual.
The difficulties and trauma associated with HBV can be exacerbated by language difficulties.
When selecting interpreters, care must be taken to ensure that they have an understanding of the culture, speak the same language/dialect and where possible are sensitised to issues of gender based violence in BME communities. Experience has led to concerns about interpreters and translators who are not on the approved list and who may often be part of the family or linked to the group suspected of carrying out the crime. The selection of the right interpreter is essential given the potential risks for the details of the victim’s account to be inappropriately disclosed to the perpetrators and/or other community members or for the victim to be threatened or intimidated by the interpreter. Police and prosecutors should consult CPS guidance on the use of interpreters.
Victims, who are not themselves settled in the UK, but are here on a temporary route e.g. a student or worker, may be particularly vulnerable as their rights to settlement or public funds, such as social security benefits and public housing, may be limited. They may be reluctant to come forward to seek help as they may fear removal /deportation and/or destitution. Some may stay in, or return to, abusive relationships, as they fear removal to their country of origin and the risk of further abuse, harassment and acts of violence. In some cultures, separated or divorced women are ostracised and harassed for bringing shame and dishonour on their families and communities.
In some circumstances, where the victim is the spouse or partner of someone who is British or settled in the UK, they may have to apply to remain in the UK. The victim will be able to remain if they are able to provide evidence that that their relationship has permanently broken down as the direct result of domestic abuse and can show they have experienced domestic abuse in a relationship, with a British or settled partner; or because they fear gender-related persecution in their country of origin. For further information see Annex D.
Children's Act 1989 - Emergency Police Protection
Local authority children’s social care may approach the police and ask for their assistance in undertaking a joint investigation. The way in which this is to be handled should be covered in the procedures prepared by the Local Safeguarding Children Board and in accordance with Working Together to Safeguard Children, http://www.gov.wales/topics/health/publications/socialcare/circular/nafwc1207/?lang=en%20f (for England) and Safeguarding Children – Working Together under the Children’s Act 2004, http://www.gov.wales/topics/health/publications/socialcare/circular/nafwc1207/?lang=en%20f (for Wales).
Where there is reasonable cause to believe that a child would otherwise be likely to suffer significant harm, a police officer may (with or without the cooperation of social care) remove that child from the parent and use the powers for ‘police protection’ (section 46 of the Children Act 1989) for up to 72 hours. The police must inform children’s social care who must assist in finding safe and secure accommodation for the girl or young woman if requested to do so. Children’s social care must assist the police, by arranging a placement for the child or young person in a place of safety, taking into account risk management and safety planning – whether this is in local authority accommodation provided by children’s social care, on their behalf, or in a refuge.
Local authority children’s social care must commence child protection enquiries under section 47 of the Children Act 1989 when they are informed that a child who lives, or is found in their area, is in police protection (Section 47(1)(a)(ii) of the Children Act 1989 ). They must also do so if they are told that the child is the subject of an emergency protection order, or they have reasonable cause to suspect that a child who lives, or is found, in their area is suffering or likely to suffer significant harm.
Care and Supervision Orders
Children’s social care may apply for an Emergency Protection Order (EPO) at any point within the 72 hours if there is reasonable cause to believe the child is likely to suffer significant harm if she is not removed to accommodation provided by or on behalf of the local authority or does not remain in the place in which she is then being accommodated. The police have the power to make their own application for an EPO on behalf of the relevant local authority, but as a matter of practice this is done by children’s social care.
An application for an EPO can be made by anyone – including social workers, police, youth workers, advocates or friends of the girl or young woman – but in practice it is usually made by local authority children’s social care.
An EPO authorises the applicant to remove the girl and keep her in safe accommodation, but this power can only be exercised in order to safeguard the girl’s welfare. In addition, the EPO operates to require any person in a position to do so to comply with any request to produce the child to the applicant. An EPO may also include directions as to the medical examination of the child (or that such examinations should not take place), although if the child is of sufficient understanding to make an informed decision, she may refuse to submit to such an examination.
An EPO lasts for a period not exceeding eight days, but it may be renewed for up to a further seven days. More information on EPOs is available at: www.cafcass.gov.uk/grown-ups/professionals/care.aspx. For further information on court orders, refer to The Children Act 1989: court orders (2014).
Sometimes an EPO is followed by an application from the local authority for a Care Order or Supervision Order (sections 31 and 38 of the Children Act 1989). Without either a Care Order or an Interim Care Order, once the EPO has lapsed, the local authority will no longer have parental responsibility.
No care or supervision order may be made with respect to a child who has reached the age of 17 (or 16 if the child is married).
When a Care Order or Supervision Order is not available due to the age of the child, children’s social care should be aware of the opportunities presented by an FM Protection Order or by making a child a ward of court, under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court. A Ward of Court Order is available up to 18 years old. A child who is the subject of a Care Order cannot be made a ward of court. More information on Care Orders and Supervision Orders is available at: www.cafcass.gov.uk/grown-ups/professionals/care.aspx.
Inherent Jurisdiction of the court
A children’s social care department may ask the High Court to exercise its inherent jurisdiction to protect the child. Any person with a genuine interest in the child, including the child themselves, a private individual or the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (CAFCASS/CAFCASS CYMRU) legal services department can apply to have a child made a ward of court.
A local authority may only apply for an order under the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction if it has permission from the court to do so (under section 100 of the Children Act 1989). Leave to apply may only be granted by the court if it is satisfied that the result the local authority wishes to achieve could not be achieved through the making of any order, other than one under the court’s inherent jurisdiction. A local authority is entitled to apply for this where they have reasonable cause to believe that if the court’s inherent jurisdiction is not exercised, the child is likely to suffer significant harm.
For the purposes of obtaining protection for a child or young person, there is little difference between wardship and the other orders made in the exercise of the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court. All types of orders under the inherent jurisdiction are flexible and wide-ranging, and an order may be sought where there is a real risk of a child being subjected to FM. Where there is a fear that a child may be taken overseas for the purpose of FM, an order for the surrender of their passport may be made as well as an order that the child may not leave the jurisdiction without the court’s permission.
Orders for the immediate return of the child or young person can be obtained. These orders can be enforced on family members or extended family members. The orders are in the form of injunctions with penal notices attached.
Applications for Wardship
Once a young person has left the country, there are fewer legal options open to police, social services, other agencies or another person to recover the young person and bring them back to the UK. One course of action is to seek the return of the young person to the jurisdiction of England and Wales by making them a ward of court. Making a child a ward of court falls within the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court.
An application for wardship is made to the High Court Family Division, and may be made by a relative, friend close to the child or young person, or CAFCASS/CAFCASS CYMRU legal services department or any interested party. Where an urgent ward of court application is required, an application should be made where possible within court hours. It is key that in such situation, early liaison with the Clerk of the Rules occurs in order that they can attempt to accommodate such requests. When it is not possible to apply for urgent wardship order within court hours, contact should be made with the security office at the Royal Courts of Justice (020 7947 6000 or 020 7947 6260) who will refer the matter to the urgent business officer. The urgent business officer can contact the duty judge. The judge may agree to hold a hearing, either convened at court or elsewhere, or by telephone.
Paragraph 16 of Schedule 2 to the 2003 Act makes it clear that there is no effect on:
- the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court;
- any criminal liability;
- any civil remedies under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997;
- any right to an occupation order or a non-molestation order under Part 4 of the Family Law Act 1996;
- any protection or assistance under the Children Act 1989; or
- any claim in tort
if making an application for a FM Protection Order.
Tipstaff - Child Abduction Orders (High Court)
In child abduction cases, it may be possible to seek a tipstaff order - this may be a 'seek and locate' order backed by a bench warrant ordering any person with knowledge of the child or young person to give that information to the Tipstaff (who is an officer of the High Court) or his/her deputy or assistants.
The majority of the Tipstaff's work involves taking children into custody and dealing with child abduction.
Related orders may require the alleged abductor to hand his/her passport and other travel documents to the Tipstaff, and order the Tipstaff to take the child and deliver him or her to a designated place.
There may also be a 'port alert' executed by the Tipstaff, to help prevent the child or young person being taken abroad. In the case of children who have been declared a ward of court for example, in cases where the court is acting in loco parentis, the Tipstaff has a role in ensuring that those children are delivered to the locations specified by the court.
Contact the Foreign and Commonwealth Office or the Forced Marriage Unit if you require further details of any other British High Commissions.
0800 5999 247
The Honour Network helpline provides emotional and practical support and advice for victims and survivors (male and female) of FM and/or HBV and abuse. It provides advice and support to potential victims, victims in crisis and professional agencies.
029 20496920 or
Henna Foundation operates a "one stop" service that works to meet and advance the needs, concerns and aspirations of Asian and Muslim children and families. It also assists voluntary, statutory services and Government agencies to improve engagement and delivery of mainstream services. Henna Foundation hosts a National (multi-disciplinary) On-line FM & HBV Directory and Knowledge Centre.
BAWSO Women's Aid (Wales)
0800 731 8147
This is an all Wales, voluntary organisation. It provides a specialist service to Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) women and children made homeless through a threat of domestic abuse or fleeing domestic abuse in Wales. They have purpose built refuges across Wales. They also provide emotional and practical support for BME women living in social housing. The service is accessible 24 hrs a day.
Men's Advice Line
0808 801 0327
This service provides a Freephone confidential helpline for all men experiencing domestic violence by a current or ex-partner. This includes all men - in heterosexual or same-sex relationships. The service gives men the chance to talk about what is happening to them and provides them with emotional support and practical advice. The advice line also has information about specialist services that can provide advice on legal, housing, child contact, mental health and other issues.
The Helpline is open Monday to Friday 10am - 1pm and 2pm - 5pm.
Southall Black Sisters (SBS)
020 8571 9595
www.southallblacksisters.org.uk (Open weekdays 10am - 5pm)
Southall Black Sisters operates a specialist centre for black and minority women. It provides advice, advocacy and support services to women facing all forms of gender-related violence including domestic violence, sexual violence, FM, honour killings and related issues such as immigration and asylum, health, welfare rights, homelessness and poverty. The front line work is also supported by campaigning, counselling and other activities aimed at helping women assert their human rights, overcome their isolation, and build their self-esteem and skills needed to live independently in security and with dignity.
The Halo Project Charity is a national project that will support victims of HBV, FM and FGM by providing appropriate advice and support to victims. We will also work with key partners to provide required interventions and advice necessary for the protection and safety of victims.
0845 607 0133
Freedom or Freedom Charity is a UK-based charity formed to give support to victims of FM, FGM, radicalisation and violence upon women thought to have brought dishonour on their family. We target schools with presentations and sessions directly with students, whilst also offering training and lesson plans for teachers so that they may also aid in raising awareness. We also have a 24/7 helpline and text-line.
Annex D - Information on the Immigration Issues that some Victims of Forced Marriage or Honour Based Crime may experience
Domestic Violence by a British Citizen or Person with Permanent Settlement
Victims with an insecure immigration status may be entitled to remain in the UK if they have experienced domestic violence and they enter or remain in the country on the basis of marriage/relationship/civil partnership to a British citizen or a partner with permanent settlement (the sponsor), subject to a two year probationary period. Victims will need to apply for the entitlement.
A probationary period is the period for which the foreign spouse/partner has limited leave to remain in the UK which is dependent on their marriage/relationship subsisting. Currently, the probationary period is two years, at the end of which the foreign spouse can obtain indefinite leave to remain in the UK with the support of their British spouse/partner. If the marriage/relationship breaks down during the probationary period, the foreign spouse/partner is normally required to leave the UK and return to their country of origin. The domestic violence rules enables victims to stay in the UK indefinitely if the marriage/relationship breaks down due to domestic violence within the probationary period and they meet the evidential criteria as set out in the immigration rules. For migrants on temporary routes the domestic violence provisions are not in the rules.
They will have to show that the marriage/relationship broke down due to domestic violence within the two year probation period and provide the requisite evidence. This provision applies even if the abuse is from persons other than the sponsor and it leads to the breakdown of the marriage or relationship, for example, where the sponsor fails to protect the victim from abuse by members of the sponsor's extended family.
Evidence Required: The following evidence is required to show domestic violence under the Immigration Rules:
- A relevant court conviction against the sponsor; or
- Full details of a relevant police caution issued against the sponsor.
If the victim is unable to provide any of the above, the following formal documentary evidence will be considered:
- An injunction, non-molestation order or other protection order made against the sponsor (other than an ex-parte or interim order);
- A letter from Chair of a Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC).
If none of the above are available, evidence from the following non-exhaustive list will be considered:
- A medical report from a hospital doctor confirming injuries consistent with being a victim of domestic violence; and/or a letter from a General Medical Council registered family doctor who has examined the victim and is satisfied that their injuries are consistent with being a victim of domestic violence;
- An undertaking given to a court that the abuser will not approach the victim;
- A police report confirming attendance at the victims home as a result of domestic violence;
- A letter from social care services confirming its involvement in connection with domestic violence; or
- A letter of support or a report from women's refuge or domestic violence support organisation.
Applicants are required to provide as many pieces of evidence as possible to prove they were the victim of domestic violence. Providing only one piece of evidence from those listed in section C would not usually be deemed to have proven the case.
Applications from overstayers, or those who apply to remain after the two year probation has ended, will be considered sympathetically. In making the application, it is important to set out the reasons for the delay.
Domestic Violence by European Economic Area Nationals
A similar domestic violence rule also benefits non-European Economic Area (EEA) nationals who enter or stay in the UK as a result of marriage or partnership with an EEA national (as opposed to a British National). The marriage/partnership must have lasted for at least three years immediately prior to the divorce/termination of the partnership, both parties must have lived in the UK for at least one year of the marriage/civil partnership, and the EEA national must have been exercising Treaty rights during that time.
Chapter 5 of the Immigration Directorates Instructions at:
In order to qualify for residence, the applicant must provide their passport, evidence of domestic violence (as outlined above) and evidence that they are a worker, self-employed or self- sufficient (including students that are self-sufficient).
If the victim cannot return to their country of origin and wants to remain in the UK, it is essential to report any domestic violence they may have suffered, particularly to the agencies outlined above, where the victim is seeking also assistance.
Asylum, Humanitarian Protection or Discretionary Leave
Other applications may also be possible for asylum, humanitarian protection or discretionary leave to remain in the country if the victim is escaping forced marriage or other dangers to their or their children's lives or well-being abroad. When assessing any claims for asylum, the Home Office should take into account any relevant gender issues, including the specific Asylum Policy Instructions under Gender Issues for Asylum claims.
For more information you can refer to See Asylum Policy Instructions under Gender Issues for Asylum Claims:
Also see the Immigration Appellate Authority's Asylum Gender Guidelines:
The victim should make an application to the Home Office before their limited leave to remain or visa expires as this improves their chance of remaining in the UK and protects their rights to appeal.
No Access to Public Funds
Victims with an insecure immigration status may also be prohibited from claiming public funds, which includes most Social Security benefits and housing under the Housing Act 1996. However, note that persons with indefinite leave to remain (ILR), refugees and those with humanitarian protection, discretionary leave to remain or right of abode in the UK, have the same entitlements to public funds as a British citizen. Also, some categories of overseas nationals with no settlement rights may also be entitled. It is therefore best to check entitlement. This prohibition does not apply to public funding (legal aid) for legal help or assistance.
Victims with no recourse to public funds can pursue the following options for housing and financial support:
From December 2009, the Home Office and Eaves Housing for Women are running a three month pilot scheme which gives housing and subsistence costs for up to 40 days for victims of domestic violence eligible to apply under the domestic violence immigration rule. See www.eaves4women.co.uk
Approach an advice and support agency, particularly women's refuges and support services (including those specifically providing for BME women), to obtain information, advice and assistance on safe accommodation and financial support. Contact the National Domestic Violence Helpline for list of agencies Tel 0808 2000 247.
Southall Black Sisters runs a small fund providing direct housing and subsistence cost, subject to availability. See their website www.southallblacksisters.org.uk.
Contact social care services (particularly if the victim is a pregnant woman, is with children or is especially vulnerable due to age, disability or ill health) for help under the Children Act 1989, the National Assistance Act 1948 and other legislation. Local authority support does not count as public funds. If possible, the victim should consult an immigration solicitor before making such an approach for assistance from the local authority as the authority may contact the Home Office to establish the victim's status.
Contact a family lawyer to make an application for maintenance for the victim from the sponsor in the Family Courts. However this option may be limited if it is a short marriage, the sponsor has a low income and if there are long delays or problems in obtaining public funding or a court hearing date.
Apply to the Home Office National Asylum Support Services (NASS) if they have claimed asylum and/or made a human rights claim under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, provided that the applications are being considered as such, or at least acknowledged, by the Home Office.