Man sentenced for Revenge Porn - Hemel Hempstead


A man appeared at St Albans Magistrates’ Court yesterday, Thursday, 17 September 2015, and was sentenced to four months imprisonment suspended for 18 months for revenge pornography.

Simon Humphrey, aged 40, was sentenced after pleading guilty at an earlier hearing to publishing a naked picture of the victim without her consent. He was also sentenced to a 10-day Rehabilitation Activity Requirement; ordered to pay £250 compensation, £85 costs, £80 Victim Surcharge and £180 Criminal Court Charge, and given an 18-month Restraining Order not contact the victim directly or indirectly.

In June 2015, Humphrey set the naked picture of the victim as his profile picture on Facebook intending to humiliate the victim. It was the victim's child who first noticed the picture being used, adding further distress to the victim and her family. The offence was reported to the police who subsequently arrested the defendant and charged him with an offence contrary to Section 33 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015.

Ruth Bowskill, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for Thames and Chiltern Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said: "Seeking revenge in such a vicious and public manner is completely unacceptable. By his own admission Simon Humphrey knew the damage that his actions would cause and yet this did not stop him.

"This sort of harassment and bullying will not be tolerated and we will do everything in our power to obtain justice for victims of this crime by robustly prosecuting all those who engage in such malicious activity.

"The CPS has introduced new guidelines for its prosecutors on revenge porn and anyone who has been a victim should report it to the police so that we can continue to bring such offenders to justice."

Additional Information
In April 2015, the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 created a new criminal offence of Revenge Pornography, making it a criminal offence to disclose private sexual photographs and films without the consent of an individual who appears in them and with the intent to cause that individual distress. A typical case of revenge pornography would involve an ex-partner uploading an intimate image of the victim to the Internet or sending it to their friends and family. It is carried out with the intention of causing distress, humiliation and embarrassment to the victim.

Previously, these cases have been prosecuted under other areas of legislation, such as the Communications Act 2003, Malicious Communications Act 1988 or the Harassment Act 1997. Under the new legislation someone convicted of an offence could face up to two years in prison and receive a fine.

The guidance on Revenge Porn outlines:

  • Revenge Porn is the sharing of private, sexual materials, either photos or videos, of another person without their consent and with the purpose of causing embarrassment or distress. The images are sometimes accompanied by personal information about the subject, including their full name, address and links to their social media profiles.
  • The offence applies both online and offline and to images which are shared electronically or in a more traditional way so includes the uploading of images on the internet, sharing by text and e-mail, or showing someone a physical or electronic image.
  • To fall within the offence, a photograph or film would have to be private and sexual. This could include an image that depicted an individual's exposed genitals, or a picture of someone who is engaged in sexual behaviour or posing in a sexually provocative way, if what is shown is not of a kind ordinarily seen in public.
  • Section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 deals with the sending of electronic communications which are indecent, grossly offensive, threatening or false, provided there is an intention to cause distress or anxiety to the recipient.
  • Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 makes it an offence to send or cause to be sent through a 'public electronic communications network' a message that is 'grossly offensive' or of an 'indecent, obscene or menacing character'.
  • Where there is more than one incident, or the incident forms part of a course of conduct directed towards an individual, a charge of harassment should be considered.
  • Where the images may have been taken when the victim was under 18, prosecutors will consider offences under the Protection of Children Act 1978.
  • In the most serious cases, where intimate images are used to coerce victims into further sexual activity, other offences under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 will be considered.