Advanced Search

University fire bomber convicted


Mel Broughton, who has been convicted of conspiracy to commit arson and two associated offences, was not a peaceful protestor as he claimed but someone who took an active part in a fire bombing campaign at Oxford University, said Crown Prosecution Service lawyer Paul Harrison.

Mr Harrison, of the CPS Thames and Chiltern Complex Casework Unit, said: "Although Mel Broughton claimed to be merely a spokesperson for the campaign against the building of the Oxford Laboratory and a peaceful protestor and activist, we produced evidence in court to show that he played a far more proactive and sinister role by taking part in a fire bombing campaign."

The case centred on two attempts in 2006 and 2007 to firebomb premises belonging to Oxford University, the first attack extensively damaging the Queen’s College sports pavilion, the second pair of devices failing to ignite after being placed under a temporary building belonging to Templeton College.

Mr Harrison said: "Evidence presented to the jury included Mel Broughton’s inflammatory speeches and his previous conviction for a similar offence, along with his DNA material and fingerprints on the unexploded devices and material associated with them. Police also found a quantity of sparklers, similar to those used as a fuse in the unexploded devices, deliberately concealed at Broughton’s home.

"The attacks were aimed at damaging property rather than people as they were carried out at night, but fire bombs are indiscriminate. As well as causing serious damage to property they also threaten the lives of anybody in the vicinity and particularly those of members of the emergency services who have the task of dealing with the aftermath.

"While our society supports the right to free speech and to campaign peacefully, Mel Broughton went well beyond that by using force against a legitimate academic institution and business in an attempt to further his aims. This prosecution demonstrates that, where there is evidence of criminal behaviour, regardless of the perceived cause, a prosecution will almost certainly follow."

Broughton was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment, with a minimum of five years before he is eligible for release on licence.


  1. Media enquiries to CPS Press Office on 020 7796 8079.
  2. The Crown Prosecution Service is the independent authority responsible for prosecuting criminal cases investigated by the police in England and Wales. It is responsible for:
    • Advising the police and reviewing the evidence on cases for possible prosecution
    • Deciding the charge where the decision is to prosecute
    • Preparing cases for court
    • Presenting cases at court
  3. The CPS consists of 42 Areas in total, each headed by a Chief Crown Prosecutor (CCP). A telephone service, CPS Direct, provides out-of-hours advice and decisions to police officers across England and Wales. The CPS employs around 8,400 people and prosecuted 1,091,250 cases with an overall conviction rate of 85.1% in 2007-2008.

    More about the CPS

  4. The CPS, together with ACPO and media representatives, has developed a Protocol for the release of prosecution material to the media. This sets out the type of prosecution material that will normally be released, or considered for release, together with the factors we will take into account when considering requests.

    Publicity and the Criminal Justice System protocol