Football related offences
- Introduction - purpose and scope of guidance
- Legal Framework
- Roles and responsibilities - Police and CPS
- Public Interest Considerations - Decisions to Prosecute
- Setting up the Investigation Team
- Establishing the Aim of the Investigation
- 'Civil' Football Banning Orders on Complaint from Chief Officer of Police
- Banning Orders - Evidence
- Banning Orders - Procedure
- Youths
- Regulated Football Matches
- Length of Football Banning Orders
- Additional Requirement of Football Banning Orders
- Passports and Reporting
- Declarations of Relevance
- The Use of Bail and Liaison with the Court
- Photographs
- Liaison with the Police
- Publicity
- Annex - Football Related Offences
Introduction - purpose and scope of guidance
This guide is designed to cover outbreaks of violence and/or disorder involving 3 or more people. This guide supplements the ACPO Manual on policing football. It is not designed to cover offences involving one or two people, and does not cover individuals committing offences against the Football Offences Act (other than as part of mass disorder).
Legal Framework
It is assumed that Police Officers and Prosecutors reading this Guide are familiar with the Football Spectators Act and the Football Banning Orders (FBO) regime. It is also assumed that they are familiar with the Football Offences Act, the Offences Against the Person Act and the Public Order Act. Almost all offending in and around football will be covered by one or more of these Acts. In summary these key Acts cover and regulate the following offending behaviour:
Further guidance is available on the Police National Legal Database, and the CPS Legal Guidance.
Football Offences Act
Creates specific summary offences within football stadia
Offences Against the Person
Deals with GBH and wounding (ss18 &20), and ABH Act (s47)
Public Order Act
Deals with violence and disorder from Violent Disorder (s2) and lesser offences
Football Spectators Act
Creates the Football Banning Orders regime, including an offence of breaching a FBO
Roles and responsibilities - Police and CPS
The key to successful investigations and prosecutions is teamwork between the Police and CPS. Nonetheless each organisation has its' own distinct role which is restated here for completeness.
Police Investigate alleged offending behaviour.
CPS Review the case, finalise the charges and prepare and present the case.
Charging Although it is possible that there will be offences that can be charged by the police (in accordance with the Director's Guidance), some offences can only be charged on the authority of a Crown Prosecutor. It is strongly recommended that all charging decisions are made by the CPS in close consultation with the police. Face to face consultation is the preferred method.
Key roles will be (a person may cover one or more roles):
- Senior Investigating Officer (SIO) - Overall responsibility for the investigation
- Officer in the Case (OIC) - Responsible for producing the prosecuting file
- Disclosure Officer
- Football Intelligence Officer - For recognition/identification purposes
- Exhibits Officer
- Optical Evidence Officer/Manager
- Pre-Charge Advice lawyer - Responsible for the charging decision
- Reviewing Lawyer - Responsible for the preparation of the case
- Advocate - Responsible for the presentation of the case
N.B It is strongly recommended that the 3 CPS roles are combined wherever possible.
Setting up the Investigation Team
It is vital that an Investigation Team be established as early as possible after the violence/disorder to be investigated. Local police commanders will get an early feel for the size of the investigation once they have received initial reports from those on the scene. Consideration should be given to identify a potential SIO in advance of high risk games. Experience over the last 5 years has shown that the sooner the team is set up the more successful the eventual prosecution. Early establishment of the team often saves work later on as evidence can be secured early and easily.
It is strongly recommended that an early meeting is held with the CPS pre-charge/reviewing lawyer and well in advance of any charging decisions. If the case is likely to be heard in the Crown Court then the advocate to be instructed should be identified at an early stage. It is strongly recommended that the CPS instruct an in-house Crown Advocate to ensure continuity of advocacy. This allows for agreement on the shape of the investigation and prosecution. Local police commanders/the SIO should not hesitate to contact local CPS managers to identify the appropriate lawyer for the case, who should be freed up for early meetings and charging meetings.
Establishing the Aim of the Investigation
Investigative strategy
It is important to set the strategy for the investigation. Many incidents of violence and disorder have large numbers of potential offences and offenders. The SIO should make it clear which offences and offenders are to be investigated, and to prioritise the work of the team. All members of the team should be clear on the strategy, so that time and resources are not spent on matters that are not central to the strategy. At this stage it is important to decide on either early arrest & bail (with controlled media release) or a more thorough trawl of CCTV and compilation DVDs prior to the arrest phase. There are merits to both or a mixed approach.
Charging policy
Following on from the strategy it is vital to have a clear charging policy and mode of trial that is followed throughout the investigation. The SIO/OIC and prosecutor should document this policy which should state what charges are being considered, what evidential threshold will support a particular charge, and what action should be taken with respect to applications for FBO's. Due regard should be given to existing national ACPO and CPS policies and guidance.
Many incidents of disorder have different levels of participation and the policy should also state a line below which charges will not be brought. As an illustration, in a recent incident after a game a large crowd gathered to confront opposing fans. Some tried to break down fencing and others threw missiles. Some gestured and some merely stood around. In this case the charging policy stated that those throwing missiles would be charged with violent disorder, anyone identified attempting to break down fencing would be prioritised and charged with violent disorder; anyone gesturing in a particularly extreme manner might be charged with lesser Public Order Act offences and those merely present would not be charged at all
Agreeing overall aim - quality, quantity or both?
It follows from this that the prosecution team should agree an overall aim. Another recent incident involved a major pitch invasion and significant violence and disorder outside the ground. Unsurprisingly priority was given to the offending outside the ground, although it would have been easy (had resources permitted) to bring large numbers of offenders before court on lesser offences inside the ground. There will be no right answer to the overall aim, but it is important to know what the aim is, and when the investigation is likely to be halted. It is perfectly sensible to agree an aim which has two strands - for example early prosecution of those easily identified committing summary only offences and slower time prosecution of more serious offences likely to end in the Crown Court. Clearly it is essential to ensure from the outset that the potential prosecution will be viable. Also, which court would be most appropriate to try the case given its severity, the strength of evidence, gaps in continuity of visual evidence and potential criticism of police tactics/numbers and resultant negative publicity. This should be balanced against the numbers of likely defendants and time constraints of completing the investigation within 6 months.
It is also key to ensure that resources are spent investigating those incidents that the prosecution team intend to take to Court.
Arrest, interview and bail policy
This section does not apply to those arrested at the time of the violence and disorder but applies to those identified during the investigation.
If the prosecution team are working well together it should be possible to agree a date on which arrests will be made so that the prosecutor can be available to give charging decisions before the detainee leaves custody, thereby easing the bail management issues. To make this effective the prosecutor should have seen and assessed the key evidence in advance of arrests and agreed likely charges with the investigators. The prosecutor must be satisfied that any video evidence is clear and supports the proposed charges. Often arrests may be by appointment as suspects are identified.
It is good practice in any investigation to have an agreed interview strategy. One strategy that has proved effective is to ask a suspect to confirm that he was at a particular incident, ascertain what he was wearing and to then ask for an account. Whether or not the suspect admits the offence and video evidence should be shown in interview and the suspect should be asked to confirm that the person on the video is him and to confirm his actions.
With good planning, the suspects should be charged and bailed to an agreed court date. Bail conditions should normally be imposed to prevent a repetition of similar offending behaviour. Whilst conditions should be specific to an individual offender, bail conditions can be drafted that mirror the requirement of a FBO. Consideration should always be given to imposition of an exclusion area around the "home" ground on match days which should be made clear on a map. For serious offending reporting conditions on match days may be appropriate.
'Civil' Football Banning Orders - s. 14 B - on Complaint
From the 6th April 2007 prosecutors are able to apply for a 'civil' football banning order. The court must make an order if satisfied that the respondent has at any time caused or contributed to any violence or disorder in the UK or elsewhere and that there are reasonable grounds to believe that it would help to prevent violence or disorder at or in connection with any regulated football matches.
For s.14 (A) and (B), "violence" means violence against persons or property and includes threatening violence and doing anything which endangers the life of any person.
Also, disorder includes:
- stirring up hatred against a group of persons defined by reference to colour, race, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins, or against an individual as a member of such a group,
- using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour or disorderly behaviour,
- displaying any writing or other thing which is threatening, abusive or insulting.
Most importantly, the terms "violence" and "disorder" are not limited to violence or disorder in connection with football.
The courts are given a wide discretion of what to take into account in making a s. 14B Football Banning Order; this includes decisions of foreign courts, evidence of deportation back to the UK, removal from football matches wherever this occurred and conduct recorded visually - e.g. CCTV.
The court can look at the conduct of the responded for up to ten years before the application for the making of an order.
If one is unable to proceed to a conviction for a (football) relevant offence in all circumstances, it may still be possible to apply for an order under s.14 (B). Prosecutors should discuss this with police officers prior to the hearing.
Football Banning Orders - Evidence
Whether the application is made under s14 (A) or s14 (B) it is important to call evidence to show the court why the Football Banning Order is needed. In s14 (A) applications the offence itself may be sufficient evidence to prove the necessity of a Ban, but prosecutors should always consider calling additional evidence to establish the defendant/respondent's history of behaviour associated with football. In all cases the prosecutor should ensure that the Court is made aware of the impact of violence and disorder at and around football matches. What might appear to be an isolated incident by a person of good character (e.g. running on the pitch) could actually be the trigger for more widespread disorder. The FIO preparing the evidence in support of the application should provide either an MG5 detailing why a Ban is necessary and /or a statement detailing football disorder and the impact of disorder in that particular Force Area - from the local Police Commander.
Where the case is brought by the British Transport Police and the offence happens on the rail or underground network some distance from the ground it is necessary to ensure there is sufficient evidence to prove the disorder or violence is football related. Sources of evidence may include a match ticket, programme, fanzine, season ticket, train tickets, football related paraphernalia (i.e. pin badges, 'calling cards' , tattoos showing team / group allegiances) and ideally a photograph of the person wearing team colours.
Football Banning Orders - Procedure
When the application is made under s14 (A) the Criminal Procedure Rule 50 requires that notice should be given to the defendant of the intention to apply for a Football Banning Order. Although Rule 50.3 states that the application must be on the requisite form, no form has been specified in the rules. The CPS and UKFPU are jointly designing a form, based on the forms used for ASBO applications and this will be issued as soon as possible. However, it is vital that the prosecutor signs the application at the earliest opportunity.
Youths
Where appropriate, Consideration should be given to diversion by way of reprimand or final warning. Conditional Cautions are not yet available for youths but will be subject to piloting in 2009 for sixteen and seventeen year olds.
There is a potential conflict between the duty to remit young offenders to the youth court for sentence (Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 s8) [PCCSA] and the requirement for the court that convicts an offender to deal with an application for a post-conviction Football Banning Order (Football Spectators Act 1989 s14A(6)) [ FSA].This conflict has resulted in youths convicted for football related violence and disorder away from their home court being remitted to their home courts and subsequently applications for FBOs have been rejected.
To avoid this conflict it is recommended that youths should normally be charged and bailed to their "home" court, even when the offence charged is committed away from their home town/city. However, if it is clear that the case is likely to be contested and there are potentially a number of civilian witnesses then it may be necessary to charge and bail the youth to the "away" court and after conviction to represent under the exception in Section 8(2) of the PCC(S) that it would be undesirable to remit the case to the "home" court. If in such a case the convicting "away" court remits the case and the sentencing "home" court declined to impose a Ban on the grounds that it had no power to do so, then the only potential remedy would be to seek a judicial review of the decision.
Careful consideration should be given before a youth is jointly charged with an adult, to avoid the potential problems dealt with above. In cases of large scale disorder it is perfectly good practice to charge each defendant separately and for youths to be charged to the "home" court and for the adults to be charged to the "away" court.
Regulated Football Matches
Football matches that are the subject of controls under this legislation must be 'regulated football matches' (s. 14). The Football Spectators (Prescription) Order 2000 sets out which
are the regulated matches in England and Wales and elsewhere.
Those in England and Wales are, basically, any association football match in which either team is a member of the Premier League, the Football League or the Football Conference (including its subdivisions, namely its Premiership Division and its North and South 'feeder' Division). Other matches may also qualify - see the Order for further details.
Length of Football Banning Orders (S.14 (F))
When made following conviction under s. 14A, a Football Banning Order may be for up to 10 years if immediate imprisonment is imposed and must be for at least 6 years. If no immediate imprisonment is ordered, the maximum is 5 years and the minimum 3 years.
If made under the section 14 (B) civil procedures, the maximum is 5 years and the minimum 3 years (as increased by the Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006).
Additional Requirement of Football Banning Orders
Football Banning Orders can be made more effective by the use of schedule containing additional restrictions, such as a restricted zone around a ground for a period of 2 hours before to 2 hours after a match, and a prohibition on using the national rail network without the prior approval of the British Transport Police. Other restrictions may be imposed and the police, especially the FIO, may have views on what may be effective restrictions on particular individuals.
Passports and Reporting
Under s.14(E), a person who has been given a Football Banning Order must report to a specified police station within 5 days and they will have to surrender their passport when required by the Enforcing Authority (the Football Banning Orders Authority - which is part of the UKFPU) under the Act and report to a police station during the 'control periods' associated with 'regulated football matches' outside the UK (see s. 14 for the relevant definitions of control period and regulated football matches). The Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006 removed the discretion of the court not to order the surrender of a passport.
Declarations of Relevance
Through the operation of s. 23 of the Football Spectators Act 1989, the court cannot make a Football Banning Order unless it is satisfied that the offence is football related. This section provides that the court has firstly to make a declaration of relevance and can only do so once it is satisfied that the prosecutor has served a notice on the defendant (at least 5 days before the first day of the trial) indicating that the prosecution propose to show that the offence related to football matches.
The court can waive the requirement for full notice to be given if satisfied it is in the interests of justice. The defendant may also waive away his rights for full notice. A finding by the court that the offence was football related can be appealed as part of an appeal against sentence. It is important to ask the court to waive the requirements if an offender appears in custody and is dealt with at first hearing.
Prosecutors should agree with the police that a notice will be served on the defendant at the time of charge, and provision made for proving service so as to satisfy the court. The court is likely to require a copy notice.
Prosecutors should ensure that there is sufficient evidence to prove relevance to a football match and should not feel limited to incidents arising at or near the ground. It is perfectly possible for criminality that would be caught by the Schedule to include incidents some considerable distance away from the ground involving those on the way to the match or for some time before or after the actual match itself. It will usually be obvious from the circumstances, but if not, additional evidence may be available on enquiry of the police. Football Banning Orders have successfully been sought for offences over 2 miles from the ground and 5 hours after the end of the game, as well as for offences on the national rail network some distance from the game.
The court may conduct a hearing analogous to a Newton Hearing to determine the question of relevance. You will need to discuss this with your court so that prosecutors are and appear to be properly prepared.
The use of CCTV evidence may be very persuasive and lawyers should not hesitate to view such material which may save substantial numbers of police officers from having to attend court to give evidence.
The Use of Bail and Liaison with the Court
The police may impose conditions from the moment they deem there is sufficient to charge and would have charged but for the DPP's Guidance. The whole range of post charge/pre-court conditions are available and can include keeping away from certain areas and reporting at specific times. The police may now also impose conditions on bail following a release under section 37(2) PACE even if there is insufficient to charge but this should only be imposed where, in the event of a breach, the police investigation is likely to produce a charging decision.
Ordinarily however, it will be appropriate where the evidence is available for an early charge and court hearing. This may cause considerable pressure on short term listing and Areas will need to liaise with the court for an agreed strategy to deal with what may be large numbers both in custody and on bail. Additional security may be required to safeguard the court and officials.
Photographs
Section 35 of the Public Order Act 1986 entitles the court, on applications by the prosecutor, to order a person on whom a Football Banning Order has been made to attend a specified police station within 7 days at a specified time to have a photograph taken. A power of arrest exists for disobedience.
Liaison with the Police
All Areas should have at least one nominated "lead football prosecutor". Good practice is for there to be one "lead" for each Premiership and Football League Club, with one "lead" as overall coordinator for the Area. Each "lead" should develop a close working liaison with the Football Intelligence Officer for the Force or Club for which he or she is responsible. A list of "lead" prosecutors will be maintained by the "Lead CCP for football matters" (currently Nick Hawkins, CCP Hampshire and the Isle of Wight) and will be shared with the UKFPU.
The success of the improved outcomes will depend on closer working with the police at a senior level. It has been proved to be highly beneficial for the CCP or senior lawyer to liaise with the relevant Police Commander in charge.
Again, a successful model has been demonstrated by the attendance of such a person at a match to observe what the police can see from their operational control as this assists in briefing the lawyers to be tasked with advising, charging and then seeking the Football Banning Orders.
For specific events, where trouble is anticipated or an agreed crack down is to take place, success will be generated by having charging lawyers on duty at the stress periods who will deal with the early advice and charging and through case ownership, will deal with any subsequent advocacy.
Whenever a conditional caution is under consideration for a football related offence, the prosecutor must ensure that the FIO is consulted before a final decision is made. This consultation should be recorded on the MG3 to the effect that the offender is not considered a "risk supporter".
Publicity
All this work will be generate a large amount of interest locally which will benefit the police and CPS if properly handled. Really good relationships with the local newspaper editors, facilities and information for the reporters, and a good media strategy will help seal not only the success of the operation but will do much to boost public confidence in local criminal justice agencies. Advice on this can be obtained from the Press Office. You will be able to refer to the National Media Handling Plan which will assist in planning your local publicity which has been circulated to the Area Communication Managers. A copy is attached for your further assistance.
Experience has shown that one or two really good joint operations can substantially reduce potential trouble locally.
Annex to guidance on football offences
Relevant offences for obtaining banning orders
(a) Any offence under section 2(1) (unauthorised attendance at a regulated football match); 5(7) (making or using false document to obtain membership of national football scheme); 14 J (1) (failing to comply with Banning Order or requirement); or 21C (2) (failing to comply with a notice given under 21 (B) (police summary powers) of this Act).
(b) Any offence under section 2 or 2A of the Sporting Events (Control of Alcohol etc.) Act 1985 (alcohol, containers and fireworks) committed by the accused at any football match to which this Schedule applies or while entering or trying to enter the ground.
(c) Any offence under section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 (harassment, alarm or distress) or any provision of Part III of that Act (racial hatred) committed during a period relevant to a football match to which this Schedule applies at any premises while the accused was at, or was entering or leaving or trying to enter or leave, the premises.
(d) Any offence involving the use or threat of violence by the accused towards another person committed during a period relevant to a football match to which this Schedule applies at any premises while the accused was at, or was entering or leaving or trying to enter or leave the premises.
(e) Any offence involving the use or threat of violence towards property committed during a period relevant to a football match to which this Schedule applies at any premises while the accused was at, or was entering or leaving or trying to enter or leave the premises.
(f) Any offence involving the use, carrying or possession of an offensive weapon or a firearm committed during a period relevant to a football match to which this Schedule applies at any premises while the accused was at, or was entering or leaving or trying to enter or leave, the premises.
(g) Any offence under section 12 of the Licensing Act 1872 (persons found drunk in public places, etc.) of being found drunk in a highway or other public place committed while the accused was on a journey to or from a football match to which this Schedule applies being an offence as respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to football matches.
(h) Any offence under section 91(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 (disorderly behaviour while drunk in a public place) committed in a highway or other public place while the accused was on a journey to or from a football match to which this Schedule applies being an offence as respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to football matches.
(i) Any offence under section 1 of the Sporting Events (Control of Alcohol etc.) Act 1985 (alcohol on coaches or trains to or from sporting events) committed while the accused was on a journey to or from a football match to which this Schedule applies being an offence as respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to football matches.
(j) Any offence under section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 (harassment, alarm or distress) or any provision of Part III of that Act (racial hatred) committed while the accused was on a journey to or from a football match to which this Schedule applies being an offence as respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to football matches.
(k) Any offence under section 4 or 5 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (driving etc. when under the influence of drink or drugs or with an alcohol concentration above the prescribed limit) committed while the accused was on a journey to or from a football match to which this Schedule applies being an offence as respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to football matches.
(l) Any offence involving the use or threat of violence by the accused towards another person committed while one or each of them was on a journey to or from a football match to which this Schedule applies being an offence as respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to football matches.
(m) Any offence involving the use or threat of violence towards property committed while the accused was on a journey to or from a football match to which this Schedule applies being an offence as respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to football matches.
(n) Any offence involving the use, carrying or possession of an offensive weapon or a firearm committed while the accused was on a journey to or from a football match to which this Schedule applies being an offence as respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to football matches.
(o) Any offence under the Football (Offences) Act 1991
(p) Any offence under section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 (harassment, alarm or distress) or any provision of Part III of that Act (racial hatred)
- which does not fall within paragraph (c) or (k) above
- which was committed during a period relevant to a football match to which this Schedule applies, and
- as respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to that match or to that match and any other football match which took place during that period
(q) Any offence involving the use or threat of violence (includes section 4 POA) by the accused towards another person
- which does not fall within paragraph (d) or (m) above
- which was committed during a period relevant to a football match to which this Schedule applies, and
- as respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to that match or to that match and any other football match which took place during that period.
(r) Any offence involving the use or threat of violence by the accused towards property-
- Which does not fall within paragraph (e) or (n) above,
- Which was committed during a period relevant to a football match to which this Schedule applies, and
- As respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to that match or to that match and any other football match which took place during that period.
(s) Any offence involving the use, carrying or possession of an offensive weapon or a firearm:
- Which does not fall within paragraph (f) or (o) above,
- Which was committed during a period relevant to a football match to which this Schedule applies, and
- As respects which the court makes a declaration that the offence related to that match or to that match and any other football match which took place during that period.
(t) Any offence under section 166 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (sale of tickets by unauthorised persons) which relates to tickets for a football match.
(u) Any reference to an offence above includes:
- A reference to any attempt, conspiracy or incitement to commit that offence, and
- A reference to aiding and abetting, counselling or procuring the commission of that offence.
(v) For the purposes of paragraphs (g) to (o) above:
- A person may be regarded as having been on a journey to or from a football match to which this Schedule applies whether or not he attended or intended to attend the match, and
- A person's journey includes breaks (including overnight breaks).
(w) In this Schedule, "football match" means a match which is a regulated football match for the purposes of Part II of the Act.
